This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CN0327
Case C-327/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 16 May 2022 — Centar za restrukturiranje i prodaju v PROM-VIDIJA d.o.o.
Case C-327/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 16 May 2022 — Centar za restrukturiranje i prodaju v PROM-VIDIJA d.o.o.
Case C-327/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 16 May 2022 — Centar za restrukturiranje i prodaju v PROM-VIDIJA d.o.o.
OJ C 424, 7.11.2022, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
7.11.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 424/19 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 16 May 2022 — Centar za restrukturiranje i prodaju v PROM-VIDIJA d.o.o.
(Case C-327/22)
(2022/C 424/23)
Language of the case: Croatian
Referring court
Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Centar za restrukturiranje i prodaju
Defendant: PROM-VIDIJA d.o.o.
Question referred
Must the rule laid down in Article 121 of the Sudski poslovnik (Rules of Procedure of the Courts and Tribunals) and the directions of the President of the Visoki trgovački sud (Commercial Court of Appeal) … of 20 January 2022, which prohibit the notification of decisions of the judges if they are not fully compliant with the order of treatment set out in those directions, be considered to be consistent with Article 19(1) TEU and with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?