Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62019TN0355

    Case T-355/19: Action brought on 13 June 2019 — CE v Committee of the Regions

    OJ C 255, 29.7.2019, p. 56–56 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    13/06/2019
    Date lodged:
    13/06/2019
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    French
    Type of procedure:
    Staff cases

    29.7.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 255/56

    Action brought on 13 June 2019 — CE v Committee of the Regions

    (Case T-355/19)

    (2019/C 255/69)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: CE (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

    Defendant: Committee of the Regions

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    declare the present application admissible and well founded;

    —

    annul the decision of 16 April 2019 and, in the alternative, annul the decision of 16 May 2019;

    —

    order the payment of compensation in respect of the material harm incurred, amounting to the sum of EUR 19 200 non-inclusive of VAT, and compensation in respect of the non-material harm incurred, estimated to amount to the sum of EUR 83 208,24;

    —

    order the defendant to pay all the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging an abuse of process and infringement of Articles 47 and 49 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants and of Articles 23 and 24 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to fair and just working conditions, of the principle of sound administration and of the prohibition on any form of psychological harassment.

    3.

    Third plea in law, alleging material inaccuracy and a manifest error of assessment.
    Top