This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FA0049
Case F-49/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 June 2011 — De Nicola v European Investment Bank (Staff case — Staff of the European Investment Bank — Sickness insurance — Refusal to reimburse medical expenses — Request for independent doctor to be designated — Reasonable period of time)
Case F-49/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 June 2011 — De Nicola v European Investment Bank (Staff case — Staff of the European Investment Bank — Sickness insurance — Refusal to reimburse medical expenses — Request for independent doctor to be designated — Reasonable period of time)
Case F-49/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 June 2011 — De Nicola v European Investment Bank (Staff case — Staff of the European Investment Bank — Sickness insurance — Refusal to reimburse medical expenses — Request for independent doctor to be designated — Reasonable period of time)
OJ C 232, 6.8.2011, p. 40–40
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 28/06/2011
- Date lodged:
- 24/06/2010
- Author:
- Civil Service Tribunal
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Italian
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Annulment requested by 62011TN0418
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
6.8.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 232/40 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 June 2011 — De Nicola v European Investment Bank
(Case F-49/10) (1)
(Staff case - Staff of the European Investment Bank - Sickness insurance - Refusal to reimburse medical expenses - Request for independent doctor to be designated - Reasonable period of time)
(2011/C 232/69)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by L. Isola, avocat)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by T. Gilliams and F. Martin, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the defendant’s decision not to reimburse sessions of laser therapy.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
