This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0350
Case T-350/18: Action brought on 5 June 2018 — Euronet Consulting v Commission
Case T-350/18: Action brought on 5 June 2018 — Euronet Consulting v Commission
Case T-350/18: Action brought on 5 June 2018 — Euronet Consulting v Commission
OJ C 259, 23.7.2018, pp. 50–51
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Case T-350/18: Action brought on 5 June 2018 — Euronet Consulting v Commission
Action brought on 5 June 2018 — Euronet Consulting v Commission
(Case T-350/18)
2018/C 259/68Language of the case: EnglishParties
Applicant: Euronet Consulting EEIG (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Peeters and R. van Cleemput, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
|
— |
annul the defendant’s decision of unknown date, communicated to the applicant by letter of 26 March 2018, rejecting its bid for lot 2 of tender EuropeAid/138778/DH/SER/Multi — Framework contract for the implementation of external aid 2018 (FWC SIEA 2018), and awarding the contract to ten other tenderers; |
|
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging that one legal group was represented twice in a single lot. |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging that one legal person acted twice as a leader of a consortium and a third time as a member of a consortium. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging that one legal group was represented in more than two lots. |
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging that one legal group acted as leader in more than two lots. |