This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TN0383
Case T-383/22: Action brought on 30 June 2022 — Good Services v EUIPO — ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)
Case T-383/22: Action brought on 30 June 2022 — Good Services v EUIPO — ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)
Case T-383/22: Action brought on 30 June 2022 — Good Services v EUIPO — ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)
OJ C 340, 5.9.2022, p. 47–47
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
5.9.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 340/47 |
Action brought on 30 June 2022 — Good Services v EUIPO — ITV Studios Global Distribution (EL ROSCO)
(Case T-383/22)
(2022/C 340/65)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Good Services ltd. (Sliema, Malta) (represented by: L. Alonso Domingo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ITV Studios Global Distribution Ltd (London, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark EL ROSCO — EU trade mark No 13 265 483
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2022 in Case R 958/2021-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision and confirm the registration of EU trade mark No 13 265 483 for all the goods and services for which it was granted or, in the alternative, refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of EUIPO for further consideration following directions from the Court; |
|
— |
order the defendant to bear the costs of these proceedings and the previous proceedings before EUIPO. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of the case-law interpreting that article and the concept of bad faith, and the point at which bad faith is to be assessed. |