Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011TN0054

    Case T-54/11: Action brought on 27 January 2011 — Spain v Commission

    SL C 80, 12.3.2011, p. 33–33 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    12.3.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 80/33


    Action brought on 27 January 2011 — Spain v Commission

    (Case T-54/11)

    2011/C 80/58

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M. Muñoz Pérez)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    Annul Commission Decision C(2010) 7700 of 16 November 2010 reducing the financial assistance from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to the Objective 1 integrated operational programme for Andalucía (2000-2006) CCI No 2000.ES.16.1.PO.003, in so far as it imposes a financial correction of 100 % on the ERDF-financed expenditure for contracts No 2075/2003 and No 2120/2005;

    order the Commission to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of its action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 39(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (OJ 1999 L 161, p. 1), as the Commission failed to take a decision within the period of three months from the date of the hearing or, as the case may be, from the date on which the supplementary information was supplied by the Spanish authorities.

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging infringement, by reason of incorrect application, of Article 39(3)(b) of Regulation No 1260/1999, since the Commission applies a financial correction to contracts No 2075/2003 and No 2120/2005 on the ground of alleged irregularities in the procedure followed in awarding those contracts, whereas the use of the negotiated procedure without prior publication of a tender notice was perfectly justified by the provisions of Article 6(3)(b) and (c) of Council Directive 93/36/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts (OJ 1993 L 199, p. 1).


    Top