Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008TN0230

Case T-230/08: Action brought on 17 June 2008 — Asenbaum Fine Arts v OHIM (WIENER WERKSTÄTTE)

SL C 223, 30.8.2008, p. 48–48 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
17/06/2008
Date lodged:
17/06/2008
Author:
Sud prvog stupnja
Form:
Pravosudna informacija
Authentic language:
njemački
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:
Link

30.8.2008   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/48

Action brought on 17 June 2008 — Asenbaum Fine Arts v OHIM (WIENER WERKSTÄTTE)

(Case T-230/08)

(2008/C 223/84)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Asenbaum Fine Arts Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Vögel, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

—

Alter the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 10 April 2008 (R 1573/2006-4) so as to allow the applicant's appeal of 29 November 2006 in its entirety, or in the alternative, to allow the appeal for Classes 6, 11 (excluding lamps (electric), fitted lamps, ceiling lamps and floor lamps), 14 (excluding chocolates), 16, 20, 21 (excluding chocolates) and 34;

In the alternative annul the contested decision and refer the matter back to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to complete the proceedings;

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘WIENER WERKSTÄTTE’ for goods in Classes 6, 11, 14, 16, 20, 21 and 34 (Application No 4 133 501).

Decision of the Examiner: Application rejected.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) in that the trade mark applied for is neither descriptive nor devoid of distinctive character.

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

Top