EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TA0288
Case T-288/11: Judgment of the General Court of 6 May 2013 — Kieffer Omnitec v Commission (Public service contracts — Procurement procedure — Maintenance of the HVAC, sprinkler and water and sanitary installations in the Joseph-Bech building in Luxembourg — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Equal treatment — Transparency — Proportionality — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to state reasons)
Case T-288/11: Judgment of the General Court of 6 May 2013 — Kieffer Omnitec v Commission (Public service contracts — Procurement procedure — Maintenance of the HVAC, sprinkler and water and sanitary installations in the Joseph-Bech building in Luxembourg — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Equal treatment — Transparency — Proportionality — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to state reasons)
Case T-288/11: Judgment of the General Court of 6 May 2013 — Kieffer Omnitec v Commission (Public service contracts — Procurement procedure — Maintenance of the HVAC, sprinkler and water and sanitary installations in the Joseph-Bech building in Luxembourg — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Equal treatment — Transparency — Proportionality — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to state reasons)
OJ C 171, 15.6.2013, p. 26–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
15.6.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 171/26 |
Judgment of the General Court of 6 May 2013 — Kieffer Omnitec v Commission
(Case T-288/11) (1)
(Public service contracts - Procurement procedure - Maintenance of the HVAC, sprinkler and water and sanitary installations in the Joseph-Bech building in Luxembourg - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Equal treatment - Transparency - Proportionality - Manifest error of assessment - Duty to state reasons)
2013/C 171/50
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: A+P Kieffer Omnitec Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Delvaux, V. Bertrand and M. Devos, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission (represented by: A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët and S. Delaude, acting as Agents, and V. Vanden Acker, lawyer)
Re:
Annulment of the Commission’s decision of 1 April 2001 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the procurement procedure relating to the conclusion of a contract for maintenance of HVAC, sprinkler and water and sanitary installations at the Joseph-Bech Building in Luxembourg and awarding the contract to another tenderer (OJ 2010/S 241 367523)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders A+P Kieffer Omnitec Sàrl to pay the costs. |