This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0821
Case T-821/17: Action brought on 12 December 2017 — Vitromed v EUIPO — Vitromed Healthcare (VITROMED Germany)
Case T-821/17: Action brought on 12 December 2017 — Vitromed v EUIPO — Vitromed Healthcare (VITROMED Germany)
Case T-821/17: Action brought on 12 December 2017 — Vitromed v EUIPO — Vitromed Healthcare (VITROMED Germany)
IO C 52, 12.2.2018, p. 41–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.2.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 52/41 |
Action brought on 12 December 2017 — Vitromed v EUIPO — Vitromed Healthcare (VITROMED Germany)
(Case T-821/17)
(2018/C 052/54)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Vitromed GmbH (Jena, Germany) (represented by: M. Linß, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vitromed Healthcare (Jaipur, India)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark including the word elements ‘VITROMED Germany’ — Application No 14 459 903
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 September 2017 in Case R 2402/2016-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
reject the opposition in its entirety; |
|
— |
order the opposing party to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |