This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0110
Case T-110/15: Action brought on 2 March 2015 — International Management Group v Commission
Case T-110/15: Action brought on 2 March 2015 — International Management Group v Commission
Case T-110/15: Action brought on 2 March 2015 — International Management Group v Commission
IO C 138, 27.4.2015, p. 65–66
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
27.4.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 138/65 |
Action brought on 2 March 2015 — International Management Group v Commission
(Case T-110/15)
(2015/C 138/84)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: International Management Group (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Burgstaller, Solicitor, and E. Wright, Barrister)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the decision THOR/C4/LL/el/(S)(2015)4287 of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 6 February 2015 refusing to grant access to certain documents pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; and |
— |
order the European Commission to pay for the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed in its duty to give reasons when it refused to grant access to the requested documents, relying upon a general presumption of applicability of the protection of the purposes of inspections, investigations and audits. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging that there is an overriding public interest in the disclosure of the documents. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed to explain why the protection of privacy and integrity of individuals prevents partial access to the requested documents. |
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging that the defendant breached the applicant’s right to good administration. |