This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TB0285
Case T-285/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 June 2009 — Securvita v OHIM (Natur-Aktien-Index) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark Natur-Aktien-Index — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Request for an amendment — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-285/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 June 2009 — Securvita v OHIM (Natur-Aktien-Index) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark Natur-Aktien-Index — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Request for an amendment — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-285/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 June 2009 — Securvita v OHIM (Natur-Aktien-Index) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark Natur-Aktien-Index — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Request for an amendment — Manifest inadmissibility)
IO C 205, 29.8.2009, p. 38–38
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
29.8.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 205/38 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 June 2009 — Securvita v OHIM (Natur-Aktien-Index)
(Case T-285/08) (1)
(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark Natur-Aktien-Index - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Request for an amendment - Manifest inadmissibility)
2009/C 205/71
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Securvita — Gesellschaft zur Entwicklung alternativer Versicherungskonzepte mbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. van Eendenburg, C. Uhlig and J. Nabert, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 May 2008 (Case R 525/2007-4), concerning an application for the registration of the word sign Natur-Aktien-Index as a Community trade mark
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible; |
|
2. |
orders Securvita Gesellschaft zur Entwicklung alternativer Versicherungskonzepte mbH to pay the costs. |