Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62007TA0238

Case T-238/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2009 — Ristic and Others v Commission (Animal Health — Protective measures — Decision 2007/362/EC — Action for annulment — No need to adjudicate — Action for damages — Principle of proportionality — Principle of protection of legitimate expectations — Duty of care — Right to property and right to carry on economic activity)

IO C 205, 29.8.2009, p. 33–34 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

29.8.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/33


Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2009 — Ristic and Others v Commission

(Case T-238/07) (1)

(Animal Health - Protective measures - Decision 2007/362/EC - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate - Action for damages - Principle of proportionality - Principle of protection of legitimate expectations - Duty of care - Right to property and right to carry on economic activity)

2009/C 205/60

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Ristic AG (Burgthann, Germany); Piratic Meeresfrüchte Import GmbH (Burgthann, Germany); Prime Catch Seafood GmbH (Burgthann, Germany); and Rainbow Export Processing, SA (represented by: H. Schmidt, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Erlbacher and A. Szmytkowska, Agents)

Re:

First, application for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/362/EC of 16 May 2007 amending Decision 2004/432/EC on the approval of residue monitoring plans submitted by third countries in accordance with Council Directive 96/23/EC (OJ 2007 L 138, p. 18), and, second, application for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the application for annulment;

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.

Orders Ristic AG, Piratic Meeresfrüchte Import GmbH, Prime Catch Seafood GmbH and Rainbow Export Processing, SA to pay the costs, including those of the interlocutory proceedings.


(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.


Top