This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0552
Case T-552/15: Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Bank Refah Kargaran v Council
Case T-552/15: Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Bank Refah Kargaran v Council
Case T-552/15: Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Bank Refah Kargaran v Council
IO C 398, 30.11.2015, p. 59–60
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.11.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 398/59 |
Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Bank Refah Kargaran v Council
(Case T-552/15)
(2015/C 398/74)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Bank Refah Kargaran (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: J.-M. Thouvenin, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should declare:
— |
that by adopting and maintaining the restrictive measure adopted by the Council of the European Union against BRK, which was annulled by judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2013 (Case T-25/11), the Council of the European Union incurred the non-contractual liability of the European Union; |
— |
that, consequently, the European Union must compensate the applicant for the damage suffered; |
— |
that the material damage amounts to EUR 6 8 6 51 318, to which statutory interest must be added, plus any other justified amount; |
— |
that the non-material damage amounts to EUR 5 2 5 47 415, to which statutory interest must be added, plus any other justified amount; |
— |
in the alternative, that all or part of the amounts claimed in respect of non-material damage be considered to relate to material damage and be taken into account as such; and |
— |
that the Council must be ordered to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law, two of which relate to the question of the European Union’s non-contractual liability and three to the damage resulting from the unlawful act committed by the Council of the European Union.
— |
As regards the question of the European Union’s non-contractual liability
|
— |
As regards the damage resulting from the unlawful act committed by the Council of the European Union
|