Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015CN0134

    Case C-134/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 March 2015 — Lidl Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co. KG v Freistaat Sachsen

    IO C 205, 22.6.2015, p. 15–15 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    22.6.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 205/15


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 March 2015 — Lidl Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co. KG v Freistaat Sachsen

    (Case C-134/15)

    (2015/C 205/20)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Lidl Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co. KG

    Respondent: Freistaat Sachsen

    Questions referred

    1.

    Is Article 5(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 (1) compatible with the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), in conjunction with Articles 15(1) and 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?

    2.

    Is Article 5(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 compatible with the second subparagraph of Article 40(2) TFEU?


    (1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 of 16 June 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards the marketing standards for poultrymeat (OJ 2008 L 157, p. 46).


    Top