Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62009CN0235

    Case C-235/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 29 June 2009 — DHL Express France SAS v Chronopost SA

    IO C 205, 29.8.2009, p. 27–28 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    29/06/2009
    Date lodged:
    29/06/2009
    Author:
    An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Fraincis
    Type of procedure:
    Tarchur le haghaidh réamhrialú
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    • request for interpretation 31994R0040 airteagal 98
    Link

    29.8.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 205/27

    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 29 June 2009 — DHL Express France SAS v Chronopost SA

    (Case C-235/09)

    2009/C 205/46

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Cour de cassation

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: DHL Express France SAS

    Defendant: Chronopost SA

    Questions referred

    1.

    Must Article 98 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 (1) on the Community trade mark be interpreted as meaning that the prohibition issued by a Community trade mark court has effect as a matter of law throughout the entire area of the Community?

    2.

    If not, is that court entitled to apply specifically that prohibition to the territories of other States in which the acts of infringement are committed or threatened?

    3.

    In either case, are the coercive measures which the court, by application of its national law, has attached to the prohibition issued by it applicable within the territories of the Member States in which that prohibition would have effect?

    4.

    In the contrary case, may that court order such a coercive measure, similar to or different from that which it adopts pursuant to its national law, by application of the national laws of the States in which that prohibition would have effect?

    (1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

    Top