Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008CB0146

    Case C-146/08 P: Order of the Court of 26 March 2009 — Efkon AG v European Parliament, Council of the European Union, Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Directive 2004/52/EC — Interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community — Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded)

    IO C 205, 29.8.2009, p. 14–15 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    29.8.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 205/14


    Order of the Court of 26 March 2009 — Efkon AG v European Parliament, Council of the European Union, Commission of the European Communities

    (Case C-146/08 P) (1)

    (Appeal - Directive 2004/52/EC - Interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community - Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded)

    2009/C 205/25

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Appellant: Efkon AG (represented by: M. Novak, Rechtsanwalt)

    Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: U. Rösslein and A. Neergaard, Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and E. Karlsson, Agents), Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Yerrell and G. Braun, Agent)

    Re:

    Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 22 January 2008 in Case T-298/04 Efkon v Parliament and Council, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed as inadmissible the action seeking annulment of Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 124) — Requirement of being individually concerned by the contested act — Right to be heard before a court — Length of the proceedings before the Court of First Instance

    Operative part of the order

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the appeal.

    2.

    Orders Efkon AG to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 171, 05.07.2008.


    Top