EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/223/17
Case T-263/07: Action brought on 17 July 2007 — Estonia v Commission
Case T-263/07: Action brought on 17 July 2007 — Estonia v Commission
Case T-263/07: Action brought on 17 July 2007 — Estonia v Commission
OJ C 223, 22.9.2007, p. 12–12
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
22.9.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 223/12 |
Action brought on 17 July 2007 — Estonia v Commission
(Case T-263/07)
(2007/C 223/17)
Language of the case: Estonian
Parties
Applicant: Republic of Estonia (represented by Lembit Uibo, Agent)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Form of order sought
Annul the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 4 May 2007 concerning the national greenhouse gas allocation plan submitted by Estonia in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1)
Pleas in law and main arguments
The Commission's decision of 4 May 2007 concerning the national greenhouse gas allocation plan submitted by Estonia in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council should be annulled on the following grounds:
— |
Infringement of Article 9(1) and (3) and Article 11(2) of Directive 2003/87/EC and the consequent exceeding of competence; |
— |
Manifest errors of assessment, since the Commission did not take into account correct information available to it, but relied on false assumptions which directly and essentially affected the outcome of the contested decision and the determination of the overall amount of emission allowances; |
— |
Infringement of Article 175(2)(c) EC, since under the EC Treaty the Commission does not have competence to adopt measures which significantly affect a Member State's choice between different energy sources and the general structure of its energy supply; |
— |
Breach of the principle of good administration, since the Commission did not take account when taking its decision of all the essential circumstances present in the individual case and did not verify whether all the assumptions made when taking its decision were correct; |
— |
Breach of the obligation to state reasons. |
(1) Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).