Το έγγραφο αυτό έχει ληφθεί από τον ιστότοπο EUR-Lex
Έγγραφο 62022TN0424
Case T-424/22: Action brought on 11 July 2022 — D’Agostino and Dafin v ECB
Case T-424/22: Action brought on 11 July 2022 — D’Agostino and Dafin v ECB
Case T-424/22: Action brought on 11 July 2022 — D’Agostino and Dafin v ECB
OJ C 340, 5.9.2022, σ. 50 έως 51
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
5.9.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 340/50 |
Action brought on 11 July 2022 — D’Agostino and Dafin v ECB
(Case T-424/22)
(2022/C 340/69)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicants: Vincenzo D’Agostino (Naples, Italy) and Dafin Srl (Casandrino, Italy) (represented by: M. De Siena, lawyer)
Defendant: European Central Bank
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
— |
find and declare that the European Central Bank (ECB), represented by the President Christine Lagarde is non-contractually liable:
|
— |
order the ECB, in the person of the President:
|
— |
order the defendant to pay the legal costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging that the ECB is liable under the third paragraph of Article 340 TFEU and Article 2043 of the Codice civile (Italian Civil Code) for the material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant himself and in his capacity as a shareholder in Dafin Srl. |
2. |
Second plea in law, which refers to principles established in the case-law of the European Union, in particular in the judgments of 28 October 2021, Vialto Consulting v Commission (C-650/19 P, EU:C:2021:879), of 9 February 2022, QI and Others v Commission and ECB (T-868/16, EU:T:2022:58) and of 21 January 2014, Klein v Commission (T-309/10, EU:T:2014:19). The applicant sets out the circumstances in which an EU institution can incur non-contractual liability vis-à-vis an EU citizen and alleges that those circumstances are present in this case. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging an infringement by the ECB of primary and secondary EU law and abuse of power by the President. The applicant alleges that, on 12 March 2020, the ECB, acting through its President, infringed Article 127 TFEU under Chapter 1, which is headed Monetary Policy, Articles 3, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 38 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and Article 17.2 and 17.3 of the Rules of Procedure adopted by a decision of the ECB on 19 February 2004. (1) |
4. |
The fourth plea in law quantifies, substantiates and documents the material damage suffered by the applicant (actual loss and loss of profit). |
(1) Decision 2004/257/EC of the European Central Bank of 19 February 2004 adopting the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank (ECB/2004/2) (OJ 2004 L 80, p. 33), as amended by Decision ECB/2014/1 of the European Central Bank of 22 January 2014 (OJ 2014 L 95, p. 56).