EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0020
Case T-20/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — VI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Equal treatment — Stability in the composition of the selection board)
Case T-20/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — VI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Equal treatment — Stability in the composition of the selection board)
Case T-20/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — VI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Equal treatment — Stability in the composition of the selection board)
OJ C 340, 5.9.2022, p. 32–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
5.9.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 340/32 |
Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — VI v Commission
(Case T-20/21) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Equal treatment - Stability in the composition of the selection board)
(2022/C 340/43)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: VI (represented by: D. Rovetta and V. Villante, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Lilamand, D. Milanowska and A.-C. Simon, acting as Agents)
Re:
By her action pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of, first, the decision of the selection board for Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 not to include her on the competition reserve list, second, the decision of that selection board to refuse the applicant’s request for review of the initial decision, third, the Commission’s decision of 20 August 2019 rejecting her complaint, fourth, the notice of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 of 11 October 2018 organised for the purpose of drawing up two reserve lists from which the Commission would recruit administrators (AD 7) in the fields of customs and taxation and, fifth, the competition reserve list, as well as, moreover, seeking compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision, adopted after review, of the selection board for Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 of 27 February 2020 not to include VI’s name on the reserve list for that competition; |
|
2. |
Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
|
3. |
Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |