This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CN0486
Case C-486/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 25 June 2019 — Syyttäjä and Tulli
Case C-486/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 25 June 2019 — Syyttäjä and Tulli
Case C-486/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 25 June 2019 — Syyttäjä and Tulli
OJ C 295, 2.9.2019, p. 8–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
2.9.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 295/8 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 25 June 2019 — Syyttäjä and Tulli
(Case C-486/19)
(2019/C 295/12)
Language of the case: Finnish
Referring court
Korkein oikeus
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: A, B
Respondents: Syyttäjä and Tulli
Questions referred
|
1. |
Is EU law to be interpreted as precluding a natural person acting on behalf of a company subject to tax who has failed to fulfil the obligations linked to the excise duty levied on ice-cream products from being sentenced to a criminal penalty for those failures if a tax exemption for activities of other undertakings relating to similar products were to be regarded as aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU? |
|
2. |
If the first question is answered in the affirmative, did a national tax system for excise duties on ice-cream products such as that in force in the period during which the offence was committed meet the criterion of selectivity as a characteristic of the concept of State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU? |