This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0721
Case T-721/16: Action brought on 7 October 2016 — Luxottica Group v EUIPO — Chen (BeyBeni)
Case T-721/16: Action brought on 7 October 2016 — Luxottica Group v EUIPO — Chen (BeyBeni)
Case T-721/16: Action brought on 7 October 2016 — Luxottica Group v EUIPO — Chen (BeyBeni)
OJ C 454, 5.12.2016, p. 31–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
5.12.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 454/31 |
Action brought on 7 October 2016 — Luxottica Group v EUIPO — Chen (BeyBeni)
(Case T-721/16)
(2016/C 454/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Luxottica Group S.p.A. (Milan, Italy) (represented by: E.M. Ochoa Santamaría and I. Aparicio Martínez, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Xian Chen (Wenzhou, China)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘BeyBeni’ — Application for registration No 12 511 317
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 June 2016 in Case R 675/2015-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
uphold the application by annulling the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 June 2016 in Case R 675/2015-5 and by refusing registration of the EU trade mark No 12 511 317 ‘BeyBeni’ pursuant to the provisions of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
— |
Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 in respect of the analysis of the conditions for its application. |
— |
Infringement of Articles 63(2) and 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 in respect of a possible infringement of the right of the defence and the right to be heard at the appeal stage. |