EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62007TB0022

Case T-22/07: Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2009 — US Steel Košice v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Act of Accession — Condition imposed on the beneficiary to limit its sales of flat products in the enlarged EU — Commission letter interpreting the condition as applying to the Bulgarian and Romanian markets from the date of their accession — Act not amenable to review — Inadmissibility)

OJ C 167, 18.7.2009, p. 10–10 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

18.7.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/10


Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2009 — US Steel Košice v Commission

(Case T-22/07) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Act of Accession - Condition imposed on the beneficiary to limit its sales of flat products in the ‘enlarged EU’ - Commission letter interpreting the condition as applying to the Bulgarian and Romanian markets from the date of their accession - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility)

2009/C 167/21

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: US Steel Košice s.r.o. (Košice, Slovakia) (represented by: E. Vermulst and S. Van Cutsem, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Gross and T. Scharf, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Slovak Republic (represented by: J. Čorba, Agent)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 22 November 2006, inasmuch as it interprets the condition imposed on the applicant to limit its sales of flat products in the ‘enlarged EU’ as applying also, from 1 January 2007, to the Bulgarian and Romanian markets.

Operative part of the order

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.

US Steel Košice s.r.o. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.

3.

The Slovak Republic shall bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.


Top