EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CA0061
Case C-61/21: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel, Versailles — France) — JP v Ministre de la Transition écologique, Premier ministre (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directives 80/779/EEC, 85/203/EEC, 96/62/EC, 1999/30/EC and 2008/50/EC — Air quality — Limit values for microparticles (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) — Exceeded — Air quality plans — Damage caused to an individual on account of deterioration of the air resulting from the exceedance of those limit values — Liability of the Member State concerned — Conditions for establishing that liability — Requirement that the rule of EU law infringed be intended to confer rights on the individuals who have been harmed — No such intention)
Case C-61/21: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel, Versailles — France) — JP v Ministre de la Transition écologique, Premier ministre (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directives 80/779/EEC, 85/203/EEC, 96/62/EC, 1999/30/EC and 2008/50/EC — Air quality — Limit values for microparticles (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) — Exceeded — Air quality plans — Damage caused to an individual on account of deterioration of the air resulting from the exceedance of those limit values — Liability of the Member State concerned — Conditions for establishing that liability — Requirement that the rule of EU law infringed be intended to confer rights on the individuals who have been harmed — No such intention)
Case C-61/21: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel, Versailles — France) — JP v Ministre de la Transition écologique, Premier ministre (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directives 80/779/EEC, 85/203/EEC, 96/62/EC, 1999/30/EC and 2008/50/EC — Air quality — Limit values for microparticles (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) — Exceeded — Air quality plans — Damage caused to an individual on account of deterioration of the air resulting from the exceedance of those limit values — Liability of the Member State concerned — Conditions for establishing that liability — Requirement that the rule of EU law infringed be intended to confer rights on the individuals who have been harmed — No such intention)
OJ C 54, 13.2.2023, p. 6–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 22/12/2022
- Date lodged:
- 02/02/2021
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- French
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62021CJ0061
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
13.2.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 54/6 |
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel, Versailles — France) — JP v Ministre de la Transition écologique, Premier ministre
(Case C-61/21) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Directives 80/779/EEC, 85/203/EEC, 96/62/EC, 1999/30/EC and 2008/50/EC - Air quality - Limit values for microparticles (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) - Exceeded - Air quality plans - Damage caused to an individual on account of deterioration of the air resulting from the exceedance of those limit values - Liability of the Member State concerned - Conditions for establishing that liability - Requirement that the rule of EU law infringed be intended to confer rights on the individuals who have been harmed - No such intention)
(2023/C 54/06)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Cour administrative d’appel, Versailles, (France)
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: JP
Defendants: Ministre de la Transition écologique, Premier ministre
Operative part of the judgment
Articles 3 and 7 of Council Directive 80/779/EEC of 15 July 1980 on air quality limit values and guide values for sulphur dioxide and suspended particulates, Articles 3 and 7 of Council Directive 85/203/EEC of 7 March 1985 on air quality standards for nitrogen dioxide, Articles 7 and 8 of Council Directive 96/62/EC of 27 September 1996 on ambient air quality assessment and management, Article 4(1) and Article 5(1) of Council Directive 1999/30/EC of 22 April 1999 relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air, and Article 13(1) and Article 23(1) of Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe,
must be interpreted as meaning that they are not intended to confer rights on individuals capable of entitling them to compensation from a Member State under the principle of State liability for loss and damage caused to individuals as a result of breaches of EU law attributable to that Member State.
