Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015TB0750

Case T-750/15: Order of the General Court of 22 September 2016 — Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft and Others v Commission (Actions for annulment — State aid — Renewable energy — Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German Law concerning renewable energy sources (EEG 2014) — Aid supporting electricity from renewable sources and reduced EEG surcharge for energy-intensive users — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)

OJ C 410, 7.11.2016, p. 20–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

7.11.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/20


Order of the General Court of 22 September 2016 — Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft and Others v Commission

(Case T-750/15) (1)

((Actions for annulment - State aid - Renewable energy - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German Law concerning renewable energy sources (EEG 2014) - Aid supporting electricity from renewable sources and reduced EEG surcharge for energy-intensive users - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 410/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft mbH (Zeitz, Germany), RWE Power AG (Essen, Germany) and Vattenfall Europe Mining AG (Cottbus, Germany) (represented by: U. Karpenstein, K. Dingemann and M. Kottmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Hermann and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 5081 final of 23 July 2014 concerning State aid scheme SA. 38632 (2014/N) implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany (EEG 2014 — Reform of the Renewable Energy Law).

Operative part of the order

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.

Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft mbH, RWE Power AG and Vattenfall Europe Mining AG shall pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.


Top