Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TA0363

Case T-363/14: Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2016 — Secolux v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a call for tenders for a public services contract — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the privacy and integrity of the individual — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process — Partial access — Overriding public interest — Obligation to state reasons)

OJ C 410, 7.11.2016, p. 10–11 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

7.11.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/10


Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2016 — Secolux v Commission

(Case T-363/14) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a call for tenders for a public services contract - Refusal of access - Exception relating to the privacy and integrity of the individual - Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests - Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process - Partial access - Overriding public interest - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 410/12)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Secolux, Association pour le contrôle de la sécurité de la construction (Capellen, Luxembourg) (represented by: N. Prüm-Carré and E. Billot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s decisions of 1 and 14 April 2014 refusing to grant the applicant full access to certain documents relating to a call for tenders under reference number 02/2013/OIL and to safety checks to be carried out in various buildings in Luxembourg (OJ 2013/S 156-271471).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Secolux, Association pour le contrôle de la sécurité de la construction, to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.


Top