(1)

The European Parliament has invited the Commission to press ahead without further delay with consolidating the legal texts on Community administrative investigations. This consolidation aims to strengthen the efficiency of the European Anti-Fraud Office (‘the Office’) and to clarify the legal framework of its mission.

(2)

It is appropriate to ensure that the staff of the Office can execute their mission in full independence. To this end, it is appropriate to manage human resources in a way that better responds to the operational needs of the Office; particularly by seeking a better balance between temporary staff and permanent staff.

(3)

While drawing attention to the responsibility of every department of the Commission and of the other institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the European Union and European Communities (hereinafter ‘institutions, bodies, offices and agencies’) to protect the Community's financial interests, and recognising the importance of prevention aspects when defining European policy in this field, including the fight against fraud and corruption, there is a need to widen the task of the Office to include those aspects. The design of legislative and administrative measures at European level needs to be based on the Office's operational practice in this field.

(4)

Given the scale of the Community funds allocated to the external-aid sector, the number of investigations carried out by the Office in that sector and the existence of international cooperation for investigation purposes, a legal basis should be established which will enable the Commission to seek assistance from the competent authorities in third countries and from international organisations in the performance of the Office's tasks.

(5)

Clear rules should be laid down which, while confirming the priority enjoyed by the ║ Office for conducting internal investigations, establish mechanisms enabling the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies quickly to take over the investigation of cases in which the Office decides not to intervene.

(6)

It needs to be made clear that the decision as to whether to open an investigation is left to the discretion of the Office, which may decide not to open an investigation in cases of minor importance or not falling within the investigative priorities set annually by the Office. Such cases should then be handled, where internal investigations are concerned, by the institutions and, where external investigations are concerned, by the competent national authorities in accordance with the rules applicable in each Member State.

(7)

The accuracy of the information sent to the Office in connection with its remit has to be checked as quickly as possible. Hence it should be made clear that the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies will grant the Office immediate and automatic access to databases relating to the management of Community funds and to any other database and any other relevant information.

(8)

The Office must be placed under precise obligations to inform the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies in good time of investigations in progress where a member, manager, official or other servant or staff member is personally implicated in the matter under investigation or where administrative measures may be required in order to protect the Union's interests.

(9)

In order to make the Office's investigative activity more effective and in the light of the evaluations of its activities made by the institutions, in particular the Commission's evaluation report of April 2003 and the Court of Auditors' special report No 1/2005 on the management of the Office (3), certain aspects need clarifying and certain measures the Office can take in conducting its investigations need improving. The Office should therefore be given the power to carry out the inspections and checks provided for by Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities' financial interests against fraud and other irregularities (4) in connection with internal investigations and in cases of fraud linked to contracts concerning Community funding, and have access to information held by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies ║ in connection with external investigations.

(10)

The Office's operational practice depends greatly on cooperation with Member States. There is a need for the Member States to identify their competent authorities for the Office who are able to provide Office staff with the required assistance in the exercise of their duties, particularly in cases where a Member State has not set up a specialist department with the task of coordinating the fight against Community fraud at national level.

(11)

If the operational, legal and administrative framework for combating fraud is to be improved, the Office must know how the results of its investigations have been followed up. Hence the Member States' competent authorities and the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies (and also — with assistance from the Commission — third-country authorities and international organisations) should be required to report regularly to the Office on progress made as regards action taken in response to the final investigation report issued by the Office.

(12)

In view of the major benefits of strengthening cooperation between the Office, the European Police Office (Europol) and the European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust), a legal basis must be introduced which will enable the Office to conclude agreements with those two agencies. In order to bolster the respective powers of Eurojust, the Office and the Member States' competent authorities in respect of deeds liable to criminal investigation, the Office should be called upon to inform Eurojust in cases of suspected illegal activity damaging to the European Communities' financial interests and involving serious forms of criminality and at least two Member States.

(13)

It is necessary, in the interests of legal certainty, to codify in this Regulation the fundamental procedural guarantees applicable in internal or external investigations conducted by the Office. That does not affect any more extensive protection which may derive from the rules of the Treaties, the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the Statute for Members of the European Parliament , the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities (hereinafter ‘the Staff Regulations’) and any relevant national provisions.

(14)

The procedural guarantees and the legitimate rights of persons who are under investigation should be upheld and applied without any difference in treatment stemming from the type of investigation carried out by the Office.

(15)

In order to ensure that the Office's operational activities are as transparent as possible, particularly in respect of the principles governing investigation procedure, the legitimate rights of the persons concerned and procedural safeguards, data protection provisions, the policy for providing information on certain aspects of the Office's operational activities, reviewing the legality of investigation activities and appeals procedures for the persons concerned, it is necessary to provide a legal basis for adoption of a procedural code for OLAF investigations. The code should be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

(16)

In order to ensure that procedural guarantees are upheld at every stage of the investigation, checks on legality must be carried out by the Office. Such checks should be carried out in particular prior to the opening and the closing of an investigation and prior to any forwarding of information to the Member States' competent authorities. Such checks should be carried out by legal experts who may play a judicial role within a Member State and who will work within the Office. The Director General of the Office should also request those experts' opinion on behalf of the Office's Investigations and Operations Executive Board (hereinafter ‘the executive board’).

(17)

In order to strengthen the protection of the individual rights of persons under investigation, and without prejudice to Article 90a of the Staff Regulations and the powers of the Court of Justice of the European Communities under the Treaty, a person implicated personally should be entitled, at the final stage of an investigation, to be provided with the conclusions and recommendations of the final investigation report ▐.

(18)

For the sake of greater transparency, it is necessary to ensure an adequate degree of information for informers, who should be informed of the initial decision as to whether or not to open an investigation and, on their express request, of the outcome of the action taken on the information supplied.

(19)

(20)

Experience based on operational practice has shown that it would be useful to allow the Director General of the Office to delegate the exercise of certain of his functions to one or more members of the staff of the Office by a written document specifying the conditions and limits governing the delegation.

(21)

The fundamental rights of the persons concerned by investigations should be respected at all times, particularly when providing information. There is a need to clarify the basic principles of the Office's information policy. Information on Office investigations supplied to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, whether bilaterally or as part of the concertation procedure, should be provided while respecting the confidentiality of investigations, the legitimate rights of the persons concerned and, where applicable, the national provisions governing judicial proceedings. There is a need to introduce a legal basis enabling the Office to conclude agreements with the institutions concerned on the provision of information. The Director General of the Office should ensure that any information supplied to the public complies with the principles of neutrality and impartiality. The procedural code for OLAF investigations should spell out the consequences of unauthorised dissemination of information.

(22)

It is appropriate to strengthen the Supervisory Committee's role and to revise the criteria and procedure for appointing its members. At the time of their selection, candidates should be engaged in high-level judicial or investigative tasks, or comparable functions. They should be appointed for a non-renewable five-year period. Some members should be appointed at staggered intervals in order to retain the expertise of the committee .

(23)

It is appropriate to widen and strengthen the tasks of the Supervisory Committee arising from its mandate and to safeguard the Office's independence in its investigative function. The Committee should monitor trends concerning procedural safeguards and the length of investigations. It should be informed of investigations lasting more than 12 months and deliver opinions to the Director General of the Office and, if needs be, to the institutions on investigations that are not completed within 18 months. It should be made clear that the Supervisory Committee does not interfere in the running of ongoing investigations.

(24)

There is a need to evaluate the judicial, institutional and operational context for the fight against fraud, corruption and any other activity detrimental to the European Communities' financial interests. To this end the institutions should be asked to coordinate their action and encouraged to consider the major aspects of European anti-fraud strategy. A concertation procedure needs to be set up between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission. This concertation should cover certain areas of cooperation in this field between the Office and the Member States and the institutions of the European Union, and also relations with third countries and international organisations, and should also cover the Office's investigative policy and reports and assessments by the Supervisory Committee. The Director General of the Office and the chair of the Supervisory Committee should participate in the concertation, which should take place at least once a year.

(25)

In order to allow the Supervisory Committee to carry out its mission effectively, in full independence and in an efficient way, it is essential that the Office ensure that all conditions are put in place for the secretariat of the Supervisory Committee to work in an independent way under the chair of the committee and its members exclusively.

(26)

In order to reinforce complete independence in the running of the Office, the Director General of the Office should be appointed for a term of five years, renewable once. At the time of their selection, candidates should occupy or have occupied a senior judicial post or an executive investigative post and have operational professional experience of at least ten years in a position of high management responsibility. A significant portion of this professional experience should have been acquired in the area of the fight against national or Community fraud. The appointment procedure should be completed within nine months. The Director General of the Office should be designated by common agreement between the European Parliament and the Council and be appointed by the Commission .

(27)

Considering the sensitivity of the position, it is appropriate to stipulate that the Director General of the Office will inform the Commission if he intends to engage in any new occupational activity within two years of leaving the post, in conformity with Article 16 of the Staff Regulations. This information should be included in the Commission's annual report on the fight against fraud.

(28)

(29)

After a four-year period, the application of this Regulation should be assessed. The Commission should submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, accompanied by an opinion issued by the Supervisory Committee. Following that assessment this Regulation should be able to be revised. In any event, this Regulation should be revised after the creation of a European Public Prosecutor's Office.

(30)

Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999  (5) should be amended accordingly.

(31)

This Regulation clarifies and strengthens the courses of action which may be taken by the Office in external investigations, and does so only in isolated respects where legal loopholes have been found in the existing system and where only more effective action by the Office can ensure that reliable external investigations are conducted, which can be used by the authorities of the Member States. In addition, procedural guarantees need to be extended to external investigations in order to provide a uniform legal framework for all investigations conducted by the Office. This Regulation fully respects the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.

(32)

This Regulation respects fundamental rights and complies with the principles recognised in particular in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Articles 47 and 48 thereof,

(1)

In Article 1, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be replaced by the following:

‘ 1.     In order to step up the fight against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the European Community, the European Anti-Fraud Office established by Commission Decision 1999/352/EC, ECSC, Euratom (hereinafter “the Office”) shall exercise the powers of investigation conferred on the Commission by the Community rules and Regulations in the Member States and, in accordance with the cooperation and mutual assistance agreements in force, in third countries.

Fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity detrimental to the Community's financial interests, including irregularity, are defined in Community regulations and the provisions of agreements in force in this field.

2.     The Office shall provide the Member States with assistance from the Commission in organising close and regular cooperation between their competent authorities in order to coordinate their activities for the purpose of protecting the European Community's financial interests against fraud. The Office shall contribute to the design and development of methods of preventing and of fighting fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the European Community .’

(2)

Article 3 shall be replaced by the following:

‘Article 3

External investigations

1.   The Office shall exercise the power conferred on the Commission by Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 to carry out on-the-spot inspections and checks in the Member States and, in accordance with the agreements in force, in third countries and international organisations.

As part of its investigative function, the Office shall carry out the inspections and checks provided for in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 and in the sectoral rules referred to in Article 9(2) of that Regulation in the Member States and, in accordance with the cooperation and mutual assistance agreements in force, in third countries and in international organisations .

2.   With a view to establishing that there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1 in connection with a grant agreement or decision or a contract concerning Community funding, the Office may, in accordance with the procedures laid down by Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, conduct on-the-spot checks and inspections on economic operators concerned directly or indirectly by such funding.

Member States shall adopt and implement all the measures required in order to ensure that the Office performs the investigative function referred to in this Article. They shall offer their support to the Office in connection with on-the-spot inspections and checks carried out in accordance with the rules laid down in Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 on economic operators concerned directly or indirectly by Community funding.

3.   During an external investigation and where ▐ necessary in order to establish that fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1 has occurred, the Office may have access to any relevant information held by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies connected with the matter under investigation. Article 4(2) and (4) shall apply for that purpose.

4.   Where the Office has to hand, prior to an investigation, information which suggests that there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1, the Director General of the Office informs the competent authorities of the Member States concerned and, without prejudice to the sectoral rules, those authorities shall ensure that appropriate action is taken and, where necessary, undertake investigations in accordance with national law, in which staff of the Office may take part. The competent authorities of the Member States concerned shall inform the Director General of the Office of the action taken and of their findings on the basis of such information. ║

5.     When the Office decides not to open an investigation it shall inform Eurojust that it has forwarded to the competent authorities in the Member States information giving grounds for suspecting the existence of fraud, an act of corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1, in the form of serious crime involving two or more Member States. Eurojust shall also be notified by the Office as soon as an Office investigation comes within its competence, in accordance with the procedures laid down in the cooperation and mutual assistance agreements concluded between them .’

(3)

The following article shall be inserted:

‘Article 3a

Cooperation of the Office with Eurojust, Europol and other international organisations

Pursuant to the powers and responsibilities conferred upon it under this Regulation, the Office may conclude cooperation and mutual assistance agreements with Eurojust and Europol. The aim of these agreements shall be to clarify the respective powers and responsibilities of these bodies and to define the cooperation between them within the framework of the area of freedom, of security and of justice.

The Office may also conclude cooperation and mutual assistance agreements with other international organisations .’

(4)

Article 4 shall be amended as follows:

(5)

Article 5 shall be replaced by the following:

‘Article 5

Opening of investigations

1.   The Office may open an investigation when sufficiently strong suspicions exist that acts of fraud or corruption or other illegal acts referred to in Article 1 have been committed. The decision whether or not to open an investigation shall take account of the investigation policy priorities and the Office's programme of investigative activities determined in accordance with Articles 11a and 12(6). Anonymous information may also be taken into account if it constitutes sufficiently strong grounds for suspicion .

2.     The decision to open an investigation shall be taken by the Director General of the Office after consulting the Office's executive board and in accordance with the provisions concerning checks on legality which are laid down in Article 14.

3.   The decision to open an external investigation shall be taken by the Director General of the Office, acting on his own initiative or following a request from a Member State concerned or one of the institutions of the European Communities or of the European Union .

The decision to open an internal investigation shall be taken by the Director General of the Office, acting on his own initiative or following a request from a Member State concerned or one of the institutions of the European Communities or of the European Union within which the investigation is to be conducted.

While the Office is conducting an internal investigation within the meaning of this Regulation, the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies shall not open a parallel investigation into the same facts.

4.   When an institution, body, office or agency plans to open an investigation acting under its own administrative authority, it shall ask the Office whether the facts in question are already the subject of an internal investigation. The Office shall state within fifteen working days of that request if an investigation is already open or if it is planning to open an investigation under paragraph 5. Failure to reply shall be deemed to be a decision on the part of the Office not to open an internal investigation.

5.   The decision on whether or not to open an investigation shall be taken within two months of receipt by the Office of a request as referred to in paragraphs 3 or 4. It shall be communicated without delay to the institution, body, office or agency or the Member State which made the request. Reasons shall be given for a decision not to open an investigation.

Where an official or other staff member of an institution, body, office or agency, acting in accordance with Article 22a of the Staff Regulations or the corresponding provisions of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants, provides information to the Office relating to a suspected fraud or irregularity, the Office shall inform him of the decision whether or not to open an investigation into the facts in question.

Prior to the opening and throughout the duration of an investigation, the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall provide the Office with immediate and automatic access to databases relating to with the management of Community funds and to any other database containing relevant data and any other information which will enable the Office to check that the information forwarded is accurate.

6.   If the Office decides, on the basis of what it deems appropriate or on the basis of its priorities for investigative action, not to open an internal investigation, it shall without delay send the information available to the institution, body, office or agency concerned for appropriate action to be taken in accordance with the rules that are applicable to it. In appropriate cases the Office shall agree with that institution, body, office or agency on suitable measures to protect the confidentiality of the source of that information and shall ask, if necessary, to be informed of the action taken.

If the Office decides, on the basis of what it deems appropriate or on the basis of its priorities for investigative action, not to open an external investigation, Article 3(4) shall apply.’

(6)

Article 6 shall be amended as follows:

(7)

In Article 7, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be replaced by the following:

‘ 1 .    The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall forward to the Office without delay any information relating to possible cases of fraud or corruption or any other illegal activity detrimental to the financial interests of the European Community.;

2.     The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and, in so far as national law allows, the Member States shall, at the request of the Office or on their own initiative, forward any document or information they hold which relates to a current […] investigation .’

(8)

The following Articles shall be inserted:

‘Article 7a

Procedural guarantees

1.   In its investigation the Office shall seek evidence for and against the person concerned. Investigations shall be conducted objectively and impartially and in accordance with the principle of the presumption of innocence and the procedural guarantees set out in the procedural code for OLAF investigations referred to in Article 15a .

2.   As soon as an investigation reveals that a member, manager, official or other servant or a person serving an institution, body, office or agency or an economic operator may be implicated in a matter, the person concerned shall be informed, provided that this does not prejudice the conduct of the investigation.

In any event, before the investigation's final report is drawn up no conclusions referring by name to a natural or legal person may be drawn on completion of an investigation unless the person thus personally implicated has been given the opportunity to make his views known, in writing or at an interview with employees designated by the Office , on all matters concerning him. The person concerned must be given a summary of such matters in the invitation to comment and shall submit his comments within the time limits indicated by the Office. In an interview he is entitled to be assisted by a person of his choice. Any person implicated personally is entitled to use the official Community language of his choice; however, officials or other servants of the Communities may be asked to use an official Community language of which they have a thorough knowledge. A person implicated personally shall be entitled to avoid self incrimination.

In cases requiring absolute secrecy to be maintained for the sake of the investigation or entailing use of investigative proceedings falling under the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority or, in the case of an external investigation, that of a competent national authority, the Director General of the Office may decide to defer fulfilment of the obligation to ask the person implicated to make his views known, while complying with the provisions on reviewing legality laid down in Article 14 . In the case of an internal investigation, the Director General of the Office shall take his decision after having informed the institution, body, office or agency to which the person concerned belongs.

The institution, body, office or agency shall, where necessary, decide on the expediency of any precautionary or administrative measures, taking due account of the interest of ensuring effective management of the investigation and of any particular confidentiality measures that the Office has recommended. The institution, body, office or agency shall inform the Office as soon as possible of the decision to take any measures under this Article or, where appropriate, of the need to initiate an additional disciplinary procedure on matters for which there is an appropriate competence under the Staff Regulations. An additional disciplinary procedure may be initiated after consulting the Office.

3.   The invitation to any interview, whether with a witness or with a person implicated personally within the meaning of paragraph 2, must be sent with at least ten working days' notice; the period of notice may be shortened with the express consent of the person to be interviewed. The invitation shall include a list of the rights of the person interviewed. The Office shall draw up a record of the interview and shall give the person interviewed access to it so that he may either approve the record or add observations.

When, in the course of the interview, evidence emerges that the person interviewed may be involved in the facts under investigation, the procedural rules provided for in paragraph 2 shall apply at once.

4.   The procedural guarantees provided for in this Article shall apply without prejudice:

Article 7b

Information about decisions to close an investigation and take no further action

If, on completion of an investigation, no evidence has been found against a member, manager, official or other servant or person serving an institution, body, office or agency or against an economic operator, the investigation into that person shall be closed and no further action taken, by decision of the Director General of the Office, who shall, within ten working days of the decision being taken , inform the person concerned and, where appropriate, the institution, body, office or agency in writing.

Article 7c

Protection of journalistic sources

In order to make it possible to provide objective information to European taxpayers and to guarantee freedom of the press, all EU bodies involved in the investigation must respect the principle of protecting journalists' sources in accordance with national legislation .’

(9)

In Article 8, paragraphs 3 and 4 shall be replaced by the following:

‘3.   The Office shall observe the Community and national provisions on the protection of personal data, in particular those provided for in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6).

4.   The Director General of the Office shall ensure that the provisions of this Article and of Article 287 of the Treaty are applied.

(10)

The following Article shall be inserted:

‘Article 8a

Notification of the final report on completion of the investigation

Before sending the final investigation report to the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies concerned or to the competent authorities of the Member States concerned, the Office shall communicate the conclusions and recommendations of the final report to the person implicated personally in the matter under internal or external investigation.

The Director General of the Office may decide not to make the communication referred to in the first subparagraph in cases requiring the maintenance of absolute secrecy or use of investigative measures that fall under the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority, in accordance with the national law applicable to investigations . In the case of an internal investigation he shall decide, having first duly informed the institution, body, office or agency to which the person concerned belongs.

If the person implicated personally considers that the procedural guarantees provided for in Articles 6(5) and 7a have been disregarded in a manner liable to affect the conclusions of the investigation, that person may lodge a request for an opinion with the Director General of the Office, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 14a , within ten working days of receiving the conclusions of the final report.’

(11)

Article 9 shall be amended as follows:

(12)

Article 10 shall be replaced by the following:

‘Article 10

Exchange of information between the Office and the national authorities of the Member States

1.   Without prejudice to Articles 8 and 9 of this Regulation and to the provisions of Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, the Office may at any time forward to the competent authorities of the Member States concerned information obtained in the course of external investigations.

The decision to forward such information shall be taken by the Director General of the Office, after consultation of the Office's Executive Board and in accordance with the legality review provisions set out in Article 14(2).

2.   Without prejudice to Articles 8 and 9, the Director General of the Office shall, in the course of internal investigations, forward to the judicial authorities of the Member State concerned information obtained by the Office concerning facts entailing use of investigative proceedings within the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority or which are so serious as to require urgent criminal prosecution. In such a case he shall first inform the institution, body, office or agency concerned. The information forwarded shall include the identity of the person implicated by the investigation, a summary of the facts established, a preliminary legal evaluation and any financial loss.

The decision to forward such information shall be taken by the Director General of the Office, after consultation of the Office's Executive Board and in accordance with the legality review provisions set out in Article 14(2).

Before forwarding the information referred to in the first subparagraph, provided that this is not prejudicial to the conduct of the inquiry , the Office shall give the person implicated by the investigation the opportunity to comment on the matters concerning him subject to the conditions, and in accordance with the arrangements, set out in the second and third subparagraphs of Article 7a(2).

3.   The competent authorities, and in particular the judicial authorities, of the Member State concerned shall, in so far as is not incompatible with national law, inform the Director General of the Office as quickly as possible of the action taken on the basis of the information forwarded to them under this Article.

4.     Information exchange and cooperation between the Office and the competent authorities of the Member States, as well as the actions and measures taken or implemented on the basis of the information forwarded to them, shall be regularly analysed in the framework of the concertation procedure established under Article 11a .’

(13)

The following Articles shall be inserted:

‘Article 10a

Exchange of information between the Office and the relevant interested institutions

1.     The Director General of the Office shall report regularly, at least once a year to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors on the results of the investigations carried out by the Office, with due respect for the confidentiality of those investigations, the legitimate rights of the people involved and, where applicable, the national provisions applicable to judicial procedures.

The Director General of the Office shall act in accordance with the principle of independence that informs his mission.

2.     The European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors shall ensure that the confidentiality of the investigations carried out by the Office, the legitimate rights of the people concerned and, where there are judicial procedures, all national provisions applicable to those procedures, is preserved.

3.     The Office and the institutions concerned may reach agreements regarding the forwarding of any information necessary for the accomplishment of the Office's mission, in compliance with the principles set out in paragraphs 1 and 2.

Article 10b

Public information

The Director General of the Office shall ensure that public information is given neutrally and impartially and in accordance with the principles set out in Article 10a.

The procedural code for OLAF investigations adopted under Article 15 sets out the rules on prevention of unauthorised distribution of information relating to the Office's operational activity and the disciplinary sanctions to be applied in the event of an information leak, in accordance with Article 8(3) .’

(14)

Article 11 shall be amended as follows:

(15)

The following Article shall be inserted:

‘Article 11a

Concertation procedure

1.     A concertation procedure between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall be established.

2.     The concertation procedure shall relate to:

3.     Concertaion shall take place at least once a year and at the request of one of the institutions.

4.     The Director General of the Office and the chair of the Supervisory Committee shall take part in the concertation procedure. Representatives of the Court of Auditors, Eurojust and Europol may be invited.

5.     Concertation shall be prepared at one or more technical meetings. The meetings shall be convened at the request of one of the institutions or of the Office.

6.     The concertation procedure may not under any circumstances interfere with the conduct of investigations and shall be carried out with full respect for the independence of the Director General of the Office.

7.     The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, the Office and the Member States shall inform the parties to the concertation procedure of the action taken further to the conclusions of the concertation procedure on every occasion .’

(16)

Article 12 shall be replaced by the following:

‘║ Article 12

Director General of the Office

1.    The Office shall be placed under the authority of a Director General of the Office appointed by the Commission for a term of five years, which may ▐ be renewed once .

The European Parliament and the Council shall designate the Director General of the Office by common agreement on the basis of a list of 6 candidates put forward by the Commission. A call for applications shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The appointment shall be made within three months of the list of candidates being put forward by the Commission. The duration of the appointment procedure as a whole may not exceed nine months and the procedure must begin at least nine months before the end of the term of office of the incumbent, who shall remain in office until the beginning of the new Director General's term of office.

If the European Parliament and/or the Council do not oppose the renewal of the Director General's mandate at the latest nine months before his first mandate expires, the Commission will proceed to extend the mandate of the Director General. Opposition to the extension of the mandate should be justified. Otherwise, the nomination procedure provided for in the third subparagraph of this paragraph applies.

2.     The Director General of the Office shall be chosen from among the candidates from Member States who occupy or have occupied a senior judicial or an executive investigative post and who have operational professional experience of at least ten years in a position of high management responsibility. A significant portion of this professional experience shall have been acquired in the area of the fight against national and/or Community fraud. The Director General of the Office must have a thorough knowledge of the workings of the Union institutions and of a second official language of the Union. The candidate's independence must be beyond doubt.

3.     The Director General shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government or any institution, body, office or agency in the performance of his duties with regard to the opening and carrying out of external and internal investigations or to the drafting of reports following such investigations. If the Director General considers that a measure taken by the Commission calls his independence into question, he shall immediately inform the Supervisory Committee for their opinion, and decide whether to bring an action against the institution concerned before the Court of Justice.

The Director General of the Office shall report regularly to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, in the context of the concertation procedure referred to in Article 11a, on the findings of investigations carried out by the Office, the action taken and the problems encountered, whilst respecting the confidentiality of the investigations, the legitimate rights of the persons concerned and, where appropriate, national provisions applicable to judicial proceedings.

The above institutions shall ensure that the confidentiality of the investigations conducted by the Office is respected, together with the legitimate rights of the persons concerned, and, where judicial proceedings have been instituted, that all national provisions applicable to such proceedings have been adhered to.

4.   Before adopting any disciplinary sanction against the Director General of the Office, the Commission shall consult the Supervisory Committee, meeting with representatives of the European Parliament and of the Council in the context of the concertation procedure provided for in Article 11a .

Measures relating to disciplinary sanctions against the Director General of the Office shall be the subject of reasoned decisions, which shall be forwarded for information to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Supervisory Committee.

5.     The Director General of the Office will inform the Commission if he intends to engage in any new occupational activity within two years of leaving the post, in conformity with Article 16 of the Staff Regulations.

6.   The Director General of the Office shall each year, after securing the opinion of the Supervisory Committee, determine the programme of activities and the investigation policy priorities of the Office.

7.   The Director General of the Office may delegate the exercise of certain of his functions under Articles 5, 6(3), 7b and 10(2) to one or more members of the staff of the Office by a written document specifying the conditions and limits governing the delegation.’

(17)

The following Article shall be inserted:

‘Article 12a

Interventions of the Director General of the Office before the Court of Justice of the European Communities and before the national courts

The Director General of the Office may intervene in cases, in connection with the conduct of the Office's activities, brought before the Court of Justice and, in accordance with national law, before the national courts.

Before intervening before the Court of Justice of the European Communities or the national courts, the Director General of the Office shall seek an opinion of the Supervisory Committee .’

(18)

Article 13 shall be replaced by the following:

‘Article 13

Financing

The appropriations for the Office, the total amount of which shall be entered under a specific budget line within the section of the General Budget of the European Union relating to the Commission, shall be set out in detail in an Annex to that section.

The establishment plan of the Office shall be annexed to the Commission's establishment plan.’

(19)

Article 14 shall be replaced by the following:

‘Article 14

Review of legality of the Office's investigations

1.     The review of legality of the Office's investigations shall relate to respect for procedural guarantees and the fundamental rights of the persons concerned by an Office investigation.

2.     The review of legality shall be carried out before the opening and before the close of an investigation, before any forwarding of information to the competent authorities in the Member States concerned within the meaning of Articles 9 and 10, and in connection with an evaluation of the absolute confidentiality of the investigation.

3.     The review of legality of investigations shall be carried out by Office experts in law and investigative procedure who are qualified to hold judicial office in a Member State. Their opinion shall be annexed to the final investigation report.

4.     The procedural code for OLAF investigations referred to in Article 15a sets out the procedure for the review of legality .’

(20)

The following Article shall be inserted:

‘Article 14a

Filing of complaints by persons concerned by Office investigations

1.     Any person personally concerned by an investigation may lodge a complaint with the Supervisory Committee alleging a violation of that person's procedural or human rights in the course of the investigation. Following reception of a complaint, the Supervisory Committee shall transmit the complaint without delay to a Review Adviser.

2.     The Director General of the Office, acting on a proposal from the Supervisory Committee, shall appoint a Review Adviser for a non-renewable term of five years. The Supervisory Committee shall base its proposal on a list of several candidates drawn up following a call for applications.

3.     The Review Adviser shall act in complete independence. He shall neither seek nor take instructions from anyone in the performance of his duties. He shall perform no functions within the Office other than those related to monitoring compliance with procedures.

4.     The Review Adviser is also competent for dealing with the complaints of the informers, including persons falling under Article 22 of the Staff Regulations.

5.     The Review Adviser shall, within no more than 30 working days of the forwarding of the complaint, give the complainant, the Supervisory Committee and the Director General of the Office his opinion.

6.     The Review Adviser shall report regularly to the Supervisory Committee on his activities. He shall present it, and the Commission, with regular statistical and analytical reports on questions related to complaints .’

(21)

Article 15 shall be replaced by the following :

‘Article 15

Evaluation report

In the course of (7)…, the Commission shall transmit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the application of this Regulation, together with an opinion by the Supervisory Committee. The report shall state whether there is a need to amend this Regulation. In any event, this Regulation shall be amended after the creation of a European Public Prosecutor's Office.

(22)

The following Article ║ shall be inserted:

‘Article 15a

Procedural code for OLAF investigations

1.     The Office shall adopt a “procedural code for OLAF investigations” incorporating the judicial and procedural principles adopted under the present regulation. It shall take account of the Office's operational practices.

2.     The procedural code for OLAF investigations shall set out the practices to be observed in implementing the mandate and statute of the Office, general principles governing investigative procedures, as well as the main investigative acts, the legitimate rights of the persons concerned, procedural guarantees, provisions relating to data protection and policies on communication and access to documents, provisions on review of legality and the means of redress open to the people concerned.

3.     Before adoption of the procedural code for OLAF investigations, the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Office's Supervisory Committee shall be consulted. The Supervisory Committee shall ensure the independence of the Office in adopting the procedural code for OLAF investigations.

4.     The procedural code for OLAF investigations may be updated at the proposal of the Director General of the Office. In this case the adoption procedure referred to in this Article shall apply.

5.     The procedural code for OLAF investigations adopted by the Office shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union .’

▐