Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CN0252

    Case C-252/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Opatowie (Poland) lodged on 20 March 2019 — QL S.A. in B. v C.G.

    OJ C 280, 19.8.2019, p. 18–18 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    19.8.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 280/18


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Opatowie (Poland) lodged on 20 March 2019 — QL S.A. in B. v C.G.

    (Case C-252/19)

    (2019/C 280/24)

    Language of the case: Polish

    Referring court

    Sąd Rejonowy w Opatowie

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: QL S.A. in B.

    Defendant: C.G.

    Question referred

    Must the provisions of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC, (1) and in particular Article 3(g) and Article 22(1) of that directive, be interpreted as precluding the introduction into national law of the concept of ‘maximum non-interest credit costs’ and the mathematical formula for calculating those costs set out in Article 5(6)(a) in conjunction with Article 36a of the Ustawa o kredycie konsumenckim z dnia 12 maja 2011 r. (Law of 12 May 2011 on Consumer Credit, consolidated text: Journal of Laws [Dz. U.] of 2018, item 993), which allow the costs of the business activity of a seller or supplier to be included in the costs related to a credit agreement that are to be borne by the consumer (the total costs of the credit)?


    (1)  OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66.


    Top