This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TB0757
Case T-757/17: Order of the General Court of 26 June 2018 — Kerstens v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Enforcement of a judgment delivered by the General Court on appeal — Withdrawal of the decision imposing a reprimand — Reopening of the disciplinary proceedings which led to the cancelled sanction — Claim for annulment — Act not adversely affecting an official — Claim for damages — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-757/17: Order of the General Court of 26 June 2018 — Kerstens v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Enforcement of a judgment delivered by the General Court on appeal — Withdrawal of the decision imposing a reprimand — Reopening of the disciplinary proceedings which led to the cancelled sanction — Claim for annulment — Act not adversely affecting an official — Claim for damages — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-757/17: Order of the General Court of 26 June 2018 — Kerstens v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Enforcement of a judgment delivered by the General Court on appeal — Withdrawal of the decision imposing a reprimand — Reopening of the disciplinary proceedings which led to the cancelled sanction — Claim for annulment — Act not adversely affecting an official — Claim for damages — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 301, 27.8.2018, p. 36–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.8.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 301/36 |
Order of the General Court of 26 June 2018 — Kerstens v Commission
(Case T-757/17) (1)
((Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Enforcement of a judgment delivered by the General Court on appeal - Withdrawal of the decision imposing a reprimand - Reopening of the disciplinary proceedings which led to the cancelled sanction - Claim for annulment - Act not adversely affecting an official - Claim for damages - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2018/C 301/47)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Petrus Kerstens (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and R. Striani, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking (i) annulment of two Commission memoranda of 27 March and 6 April 2017 and (ii) compensation for the non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of the outcome and duration of the disciplinary proceedings CMS 15/017 and CMS 12/063.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Mr Petrus Kerstens is ordered to pay the costs. |