This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0098
Case T-98/15: Action brought on 25 February 2015 — Tubes Radiatori v OHIM — Antrax It (Heating radiators)
Case T-98/15: Action brought on 25 February 2015 — Tubes Radiatori v OHIM — Antrax It (Heating radiators)
Case T-98/15: Action brought on 25 February 2015 — Tubes Radiatori v OHIM — Antrax It (Heating radiators)
OJ C 138, 27.4.2015, p. 60–61
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.4.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 138/60 |
Action brought on 25 February 2015 — Tubes Radiatori v OHIM — Antrax It (Heating radiators)
(Case T-98/15)
(2015/C 138/78)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Tubes Radiatori Srl (Resana, Italy) (represented by: S. Verea, K. Muraro, M. Balestriero and P. Menapace, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Antrax It Srl (Resana, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant
Design at issue: Community design for ‘heating radiators’ — Community design No 169 370-0002
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 December 2014 in Case R 1643/2014-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision and, consequently, find and declare that Community design No 169 370-0002, belonging to Tubes Radiatori Srl, is valid, since it is new and has individual character; |
|
— |
order OHIM to pay the costs pursuant to Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 1d of Regulation (EC) No 216/96, the adversarial principle, and the duty to provide a statement of reasons; |
|
— |
Objection of res judicata. |