EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0068
Case T-68/15: Action brought on 12 February 2015 — Scandlines Øresund e.a. v Commission
Case T-68/15: Action brought on 12 February 2015 — Scandlines Øresund e.a. v Commission
Case T-68/15: Action brought on 12 February 2015 — Scandlines Øresund e.a. v Commission
OJ C 138, 27.4.2015, p. 56–57
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
27.4.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 138/56 |
Action brought on 12 February 2015 — Scandlines Øresund e.a. v Commission
(Case T-68/15)
(2015/C 138/73)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Scandlines Øresund I/S (Helsingør, Denmark), HH Ferries Helsingor ApS (Helsingør, Denmark), HH-Ferries Helsingborg AB (Helsingborg, Sweden) (represented by: M. Johansson, R. Azelius and P. Remnelid, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
— |
annul the contested decision; and |
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The present application is brought pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union for annulment of the decision by the European Commission of 15 October 2014 under Article 107(3)(b) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (in Cases SA.36558 and SA.38371 — Denmark, and SA.36662 — Sweden, Aid granted to Øresundsbro Konsortiet).
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging errors of law and errors of assessment.
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to initiate the formal investigation procedure.
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty to state reasons.
|