Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62011TN0625

    Case T-625/11: Action brought on 2 December 2011 — BSH v OHIM (ecodoor)

    OJ C 32, 4.2.2012, p. 39–39 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    4.2.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 32/39

    Action brought on 2 December 2011 — BSH v OHIM (ecodoor)

    (Case T-625/11)

    2012/C 32/77

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by S. Biagosch, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 September 2011 in Case R 340/2011-1;

    —

    Order OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the applicant.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ecoDoor’ for goods in Classes 7, 9 and 11

    Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of registration.

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009, since the Community mark concerned is distinctive and not purely descriptive.

    Top