This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TA0536
Case T-536/12: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2014 — Aroa Bodegas v OHIM — Bodegas Muga (aroa) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community figurative mark aroa — Earlier national figurative mark Aro — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion)
Case T-536/12: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2014 — Aroa Bodegas v OHIM — Bodegas Muga (aroa) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community figurative mark aroa — Earlier national figurative mark Aro — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion)
Case T-536/12: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2014 — Aroa Bodegas v OHIM — Bodegas Muga (aroa) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community figurative mark aroa — Earlier national figurative mark Aro — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion)
OJ C 380, 27.10.2014, p. 8–9
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
27.10.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 380/8 |
Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2014 — Aroa Bodegas v OHIM — Bodegas Muga (aroa)
(Case T-536/12) (1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community figurative mark aroa - Earlier national figurative mark Aro - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Likelihood of confusion))
2014/C 380/10
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Aroa Bodegas, SL (Zurukoain, Spain) (represented by: S. Alonso Maruri, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Bodegas Muga, SL (Haro, Spain) (represented by: L. Broschat García, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 October 2012 (Case R 1845/2010-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Bodegas Muga, SL and Aroa Bodegas, SL.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Aroa Bodegas, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
3. |
Orders Bodegas Muga, SL to bear its own costs. |