Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62009FN0063

Case F-63/09: Action brought on 26 June 2009 — Donati v ECB

OJ C 205, 29.8.2009, p. 50–50 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
26/06/2009
Date lodged:
26/06/2009
Author:
Civil Service Tribunal
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
French

29.8.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/50

Action brought on 26 June 2009 — Donati v ECB

(Case F-63/09)

2009/C 205/93

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Paola Donati (Frankfurt on Main, Germany) (represented by: L. Levi, M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the ECB’s decision not to take further action on the claims relating to alleged psychological harassment suffered by the applicant, and compensation for the non-material harm suffered.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

—

annul the decision of the Board of Directors of 16 December 2008 in so far as it involves a threat and an attempt to intimidate the applicant;

—

annul the decision of the Board of Directors of 16 December 2008 in so far as it does not contain a decision on the result of the administrative investigation and on the final outcome of the applicant’s complaint; in the alternative, annul the Board of Director’s decision of 16 December 2008 in so far as it contains an ‘implied’ decision to take no further action on the applicant’s complaint and not to adopt subsequent measures, in particular not to open disciplinary proceedings;

—

annul, so far as is necessary, the decision of 16 April 2008 rejecting the applicant’s ‘special appeal’;

—

order the defendant to pay compensation for the non-material harm suffered, assessed on equitable principles at EUR 10 000;

—

order the European Central Bank to pay the costs.
Top