This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TN0233
Case T-233/08: Action brought on 16 June 2008 — MPDV Mikrolab v OHIM (ROI ANALYZER)
Case T-233/08: Action brought on 16 June 2008 — MPDV Mikrolab v OHIM (ROI ANALYZER)
Case T-233/08: Action brought on 16 June 2008 — MPDV Mikrolab v OHIM (ROI ANALYZER)
OJ C 223, 30.8.2008, p. 49–49
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 16/06/2008
- Date lodged:
- 16/06/2008
- Author:
- Court of First Instance
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 31994R0040: A07P1PTB)
- 31994R0040: A07P1PTC)
- Link
|
30.8.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 223/49 |
Action brought on 16 June 2008 — MPDV Mikrolab v OHIM (ROI ANALYZER)
(Case T-233/08)
(2008/C 223/86)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: MPDV Mikrolab GmbH, Mikroprozessordatenverarbeitung und Mikroprozessorlabor (Mosbach, Germany) (represented by: W. Göpfert, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
|
— |
Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 April 2008 in Case R 1525/2006-4; |
|
— |
Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ROI ANALYZER’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35 and 42 (Application No 4 866 042).
Decision of the Examiner: Application rejected in part.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) in that the trade mark applied for does not lack distinctive character and no requirement of availability exists for it.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).
