Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TA0240

    Case T-240/08: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 July 2009 — Procter & Gamble v OHIM — Laboratorios Alcala Farma (oli) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative Community mark oli — Earlier Community word marks OLAY — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 [now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009])

    OJ C 205, 29.8.2009, p. 36–36 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    29.8.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 205/36


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 July 2009 — Procter & Gamble v OHIM — Laboratorios Alcala Farma (oli)

    (Case T-240/08) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative Community mark oli - Earlier Community word marks OLAY - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 [now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009])

    2009/C 205/66

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: The Procter & Gamble Company (Cincinnati, Ohio, United States) (represented by: T. Scourfield, N. Beckett, Solicitors and A. Speck, Barrister)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Laboratorios Alcala Farma SL (Madrid, Spain)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 April 2008 (Case R 1481/2007-2), relating to opposition proceedings between The Procter & Gamble Company and Laboratorios Alcala Farma, SL

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders The Procter & Gamble Company to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 209, 15.8.2008.


    Top