Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008CA0567

    Case C-567/08: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2005/36/EC — Recognition of professional qualifications — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

    OJ C 205, 29.8.2009, p. 13–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    29.8.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 205/13


    Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

    (Case C-567/08) (1)

    (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2005/36/EC - Recognition of professional qualifications - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

    2009/C 205/23

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and V. Peere, Agents)

    Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: C. Schiltz, Agent)

    Re:

    Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to have adopted or notified, within the prescribed period, all the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Declares that, by not adopting, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

    2.

    Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 44, 21.02.2009.


    Top