This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62005FA0130
Case F-130/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2007 — Soares v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Reconstitution of career — Absence of staff reports — Comparative examination of merits — Request under Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Admissibility of the action — New and substantial fact)
Case F-130/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2007 — Soares v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Reconstitution of career — Absence of staff reports — Comparative examination of merits — Request under Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Admissibility of the action — New and substantial fact)
Case F-130/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2007 — Soares v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Reconstitution of career — Absence of staff reports — Comparative examination of merits — Request under Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Admissibility of the action — New and substantial fact)
OJ C 22, 26.1.2008, p. 53–53
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 13/12/2007
- Date lodged:
- 31/12/2005
- Author:
- Civil Service Tribunal
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- French
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
26.1.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 22/53 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2007 — Soares v Commission
(Case F-130/05) (1)
(Staff case - Officials - Reconstitution of career - Absence of staff reports - Comparative examination of merits - Request under Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Admissibility of the action - New and substantial fact)
(2008/C 22/99)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Carlos Alberto Soares (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and K. Herrmann)
Re:
Annulment of the decision of the appointing authority of 19 September 2005 rejecting the applicant's claim for a favourable reconstitution of his career.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the application; |
|
2. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
(1) OJ C 60 of 11.3.2006, p. 57.
