Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62011TN0326

Case T-326/11: Action brought on 20 June 2011 — Brainlab v OHIM (BrainLAB)

SL C 269, 10.9.2011, p. 50–50 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
20/06/2011
Date lodged:
20/06/2011
Author:
Opći sud
Form:
Pravosudna informacija
Authentic language:
njemački
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:
Link

10.9.2011   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/50

Action brought on 20 June 2011 — Brainlab v OHIM (BrainLAB)

(Case T-326/11)

2011/C 269/111

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Brainlab AG (Feldkirchen, Germany) (represented by J. Bauer, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 April 2011 in Case R 1596/2010-4;

—

Refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) for a decision on the question whether all due care was taken in respect of the renewal of the relevant Community trade mark BrainLAB, No 1 290 113;

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark BrainLAB for goods and services in Classes 9, 10 and 42

Decision of the department ‘Register and associated databases’: Dismissal of the application for restitutio in integrum as regards the time-limit for filing the request for renewal and paying the renewal fee

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the application for restitutio in integrum and finding that Community trade mark No 1 290 113 had expired

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 81 of Regulation No 207/2009 as it was not possible for any of the parties, in spite of all due care required by the circumstances having been taken, to comply with a time-limit vis-à-vis the defendant, as a result of which the loss of a right occurred and the two-month time-limit for the filing of the application for restitutio in integrum was complied with.

Top