Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011TA0109

    Case T-109/11: Judgment of the General Court of 23 April 2013 — Apollo Tyres v OHIM — Endurance Technologies (ENDURANCE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ENDURACE — Earlier Community figurative mark ENDURANCE — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Partial refusal of registration — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion)

    SL C 156, 1.6.2013, p. 40–40 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    1.6.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 156/40


    Judgment of the General Court of 23 April 2013 — Apollo Tyres v OHIM — Endurance Technologies (ENDURANCE)

    (Case T-109/11) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark ENDURACE - Earlier Community figurative mark ENDURANCE - Relative grounds for refusal - Similarity of the goods and services - Similarity of the signs - Partial refusal of registration - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Likelihood of confusion)

    2013/C 156/72

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Apollo Tyres AG (Baden, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Szilvasi, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Endurance Technologies Pvt Ltd (Aurangabad, India)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 November 2010 (Case R 625/2010-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Endurance Technologies Pvt Ltd and Apollo Tyres AG

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action.

    2.

    Orders Apollo Tyres AG to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 130, 30.4.2011.


    Top