This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62006FA0061
Case F-61/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 10 July 2008 — Cathy Sapara v Eurojust (Staff cases — Members of the temporary staff — Recruitment — Probationary period — Extension of probationary period — Dismissal at the end of the probationary period — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Rights of the defence — Manifest error of assessment — Psychological harassment)
Case F-61/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 10 July 2008 — Cathy Sapara v Eurojust (Staff cases — Members of the temporary staff — Recruitment — Probationary period — Extension of probationary period — Dismissal at the end of the probationary period — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Rights of the defence — Manifest error of assessment — Psychological harassment)
Case F-61/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 10 July 2008 — Cathy Sapara v Eurojust (Staff cases — Members of the temporary staff — Recruitment — Probationary period — Extension of probationary period — Dismissal at the end of the probationary period — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Rights of the defence — Manifest error of assessment — Psychological harassment)
SL C 260, 11.10.2008, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
11.10.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 260/19 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 10 July 2008 — Cathy Sapara v Eurojust
(Case F-61/06) (1)
(Staff cases - Members of the temporary staff - Recruitment - Probationary period - Extension of probationary period - Dismissal at the end of the probationary period - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Rights of the defence - Manifest error of assessment - Psychological harassment)
(2008/C 260/35)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Cathy Sapara (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Vandersanden and C. Ronzi, lawyers)
Defendant: Eurojust (represented by: L. Defalque, lawyer)
Re:
Staff case — First, annulment of the decision by EUROJUST of 6 July 2005 terminating her applicant's temporary agent contract at the end of her probationary period and, secondly, a claim for damages.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1. |
Dismisses the action. |
2. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
(1) OJ C 165, 15.7.2006, p. 35.