Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018CN0264

    Case C-264/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 13 April 2018 — P. M., N. G.d.M., P. V.d.S. v Ministerraad

    IO C 276, 6.8.2018, p. 15–16 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    201807200162012732018/C 276/222642018CJC27620180806EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180413151621

    Case C-264/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 13 April 2018 — P. M., N. G.d.M., P. V.d.S. v Ministerraad

    Top

    C2762018EN1510120180413EN0022151162

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 13 April 2018 — P. M., N. G.d.M., P. V.d.S. v Ministerraad

    (Case C-264/18)

    2018/C 276/22Language of the case: Dutch

    Referring court

    Grondwettelijk Hof

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicants: P. M., N. G.d.M., P. V.d.S.

    Defendant: Ministerraad

    Question referred

    Is Article 10(c) and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) of Directive 2014/24/EU ( 1 ) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014‘on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC’ compatible with the principle of equal treatment, whether or not read in conjunction with the principle of subsidiarity and with Articles 49 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, since the services mentioned therein are excluded from the application of the procurement rules in the aforementioned Directive which nevertheless guarantee full competition and free movement in the procurement of services by public authorities?


    ( 1 ) OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65.

    Top