This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0791
Case T-791/17: Action brought on 5 December 2017 — St. Andrews Links v EUIPO (ST ANDREWS)
Case T-791/17: Action brought on 5 December 2017 — St. Andrews Links v EUIPO (ST ANDREWS)
Case T-791/17: Action brought on 5 December 2017 — St. Andrews Links v EUIPO (ST ANDREWS)
IO C 42, 5.2.2018, pp. 37–38
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
5.2.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 42/37 |
Action brought on 5 December 2017 — St. Andrews Links v EUIPO (ST ANDREWS)
(Case T-791/17)
(2018/C 042/52)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: St. Andrews Links Ltd (St. Andrews, United Kingdom) (represented by: B. Hattier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘ST ANDREWS’ — Application for registration No 11 176 773
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 October 2017 in Case R 93/2017-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
consider the present appeal admissible; |
|
— |
annul the contested decision insofar as it dismissed the appeal for the following services in class 41: ‘Arranging and conducting entertainment conferences, congresses, events, competitions and seminars; Club services (entertainment or education); Providing a website featuring information regarding conferences, congresses, events, competitions and seminars; Special event planning; Organization of cultural events and of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes, Publication of books, electronic books and journals on-line; Vocational guidance and instructions services (education or training advice)’; |
|
— |
allow the European Union trademark application No. 11 176 773 for registration for the above-mentioned services; and |
|
— |
order EUIPO to bear the fees and costs incurred by the Applicant in the course of the present proceeding. |
Plea in law
|
— |
The Board of Appeal made a wrong appreciation of the distinctive character of the European Union trademark application No. 11 176 773 in relation with certain services in class 41. |