Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TN0016

    Case T-16/17: Action brought on 13 January 2017 — APF v Parliament

    IO C 63, 27.2.2017, p. 43–44 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    27.2.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 63/43


    Action brought on 13 January 2017 — APF v Parliament

    (Case T-16/17)

    (2017/C 063/56)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Alliance for Peace and Freedom (APF) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Richter, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Parliament

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    Annul Article I.4.1 of the defendant’s decision of 12 December 2016 (Number: FINS 2017 15) relating to the reduction of the pre-financing amount to 33 % of the agreed maximum amount and the order that security be provided;

    Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law, which are essentially identical with or similar to the pleas in law set out in Case T-13/17, Europa Terra Nostra v Parliament.


    Top