Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015CN0465

    Case C-465/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 3 September 2015 — Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg

    IO C 398, 30.11.2015, p. 17–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    30.11.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 398/17


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 3 September 2015 — Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg

    (Case C-465/15)

    (2015/C 398/21)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann GmbH

    Defendant: Hauptzollamt Duisburg

    Question referred

    Is the third indent of Article 2(4)(b) of Council Directive (EC) No 2003/96 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (1) to be interpreted with respect to the blast furnace process for the production of pig iron as meaning that electricity for the propulsion of the turbo blower is to be regarded as electricity which is used principally for the purposes of chemical reduction?


    (1)  Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51).


    Top