Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TN0390

    Case T-390/14: Action brought on 3 June 2014 — Établissement Amra/OHIM (KJ KANGOO JUMPS XR)

    IO C 315, 15.9.2014, p. 64–65 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    15.9.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 315/64


    Action brought on 3 June 2014 — Établissement Amra/OHIM

    (KJ KANGOO JUMPS XR)

    (Case T-390/14)

    2014/C 315/108

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Établissement Amra (Vaduz, Liechtenstein) (represented by: S. Rizzo, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 March 2014 in Case R 1511/2013-2 in its entirety;

    Order the defendant to pay the costs

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark concerned: The position mark, consisting of the lower spring portion of a sporting and exercising device and containing the word elements ‘KJ KANGOO JUMPS XR’ for goods in Class 28 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 7 26  494

    Decision of the Examiner: The application was rejected

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was dismissed

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.


    Top