This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TB0422
Case T-422/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2011 — Emme v Commission (Interim measures — Competition — Commission decision imposing a fine — Bank guarantee — Application to suspend the operation of a measure — Financial loss — No exceptional circumstances — No urgency)
Case T-422/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2011 — Emme v Commission (Interim measures — Competition — Commission decision imposing a fine — Bank guarantee — Application to suspend the operation of a measure — Financial loss — No exceptional circumstances — No urgency)
Case T-422/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2011 — Emme v Commission (Interim measures — Competition — Commission decision imposing a fine — Bank guarantee — Application to suspend the operation of a measure — Financial loss — No exceptional circumstances — No urgency)
IO C 269, 10.9.2011, p. 49–49
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.9.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 269/49 |
Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2011 — Emme v Commission
(Case T-422/10 R)
(Interim measures - Competition - Commission decision imposing a fine - Bank guarantee - Application to suspend the operation of a measure - Financial loss - No exceptional circumstances - No urgency)
2011/C 269/108
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Emme Holding SpA (Pescara, Italy) (represented by: G. Visconti, E. Vassallo di Castiglione, M. Siragusa, M. Beretta and P. Ferrari, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Gencarelli, V. Bottka and P. Manzini, Agents)
Re:
Application to suspend the operation of Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing steel) and to dispense the applicant from the obligation to provide a bank guarantee so as to avoid immediate recovery of the fine imposed under Article 2 of that decision.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Costs are reserved. |