Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019TA0518

    Case T-518/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Sipcam Oxon v Commission (Plant protection products — Active substance chlorothalonil — Non-renewal of inclusion in the annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 — Assessment procedure — Rights of the defence — Proposed classification of an active substance — Legal certainty — Proportionality — Precautionary principle)

    IO C 481, 29.11.2021, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    29.11.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 481/22


    Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Sipcam Oxon v Commission

    (Case T-518/19) (1)

    (Plant protection products - Active substance chlorothalonil - Non-renewal of inclusion in the annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 - Assessment procedure - Rights of the defence - Proposed classification of an active substance - Legal certainty - Proportionality - Precautionary principle)

    (2021/C 481/30)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Sipcam Oxon SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: C. Mereu and P. Sellar, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras, A. Dawes and I. Naglis, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/677 of 29 April 2019 concerning the non-renewal of the approval of the active substance chlorothalonil, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2019 L 114, p. 15).

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Sipcam Oxon SpA to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.


    (1)  OJ C 305, 9.9.2019.


    Top