Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TB0658

Case T-658/17: Order of the General Court of 12 November 2018 — Stichting Against Child Trafficking v Commission (Action for annulment and for failure to act — Legal person informing OLAF of potentially reprehensible conduct — OLAF’s decision not to open an investigation — Measure not open to challenge — Inadmissibility — Costs — Equity — Article 135(1) of the Rules of Procedure)

IO C 44, 4.2.2019, p. 63–64 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

4.2.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/63


Order of the General Court of 12 November 2018 — Stichting Against Child Trafficking v Commission

(Case T-658/17) (1)

((Action for annulment and for failure to act - Legal person informing OLAF of potentially reprehensible conduct - OLAF’s decision not to open an investigation - Measure not open to challenge - Inadmissibility - Costs - Equity - Article 135(1) of the Rules of Procedure))

(2019/C 44/82)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Stichting Against Child Trafficking (Nijmegen, Netherlands) (represented by: E. Agstner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and C. Tritz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Request on the basis of Articles 263 and 265 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 3 August 2017 not to open an administrative investigation in Case OC/2017/0451 and, second, an order requiring OLAF to open an administrative investigation and, depending on the findings of that investigation, to refer the case to the national law enforcement authorities for the purpose of criminal proceedings, and/or to the institutions of the European Union for the purpose of an administrative procedure.

Operative part of the order

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.

Stichting Against Child Trafficking shall pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.


Top