Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022CN0057

    Case C-57/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 28 January 2022 — YQ v Ředitelství silnic a dálnic ČR

    OJ C 207, 23.5.2022, p. 11–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 207, 23.5.2022, p. 10–11 (GA)

    23.5.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 207/11


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 28 January 2022 — YQ v Ředitelství silnic a dálnic ČR

    (Case C-57/22)

    (2022/C 207/16)

    Language of the case: Czech

    Referring court

    Nejvyšší soud České republiky

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: YQ

    Defendant: Ředitelství silnic a dálnic ČR

    Question referred

    Must Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time be interpreted as precluding national case-law by virtue of which a worker who was unlawfully dismissed then reinstated in his or her employment, in accordance with national law, following the annulment of the dismissal by a decision of a court, is not entitled to paid annual leave for the period between the date of the dismissal and that of the reinstatement in his or her employment on the ground that, during that period, that worker did not actually carry out work for the employer, also in cases when, according to national legislation, the worker who has been unlawfully dismissed and who has without undue delay informed his or her employer in writing that he or she insists on being employed, is entitled to wage or salary compensation in the amount of average earnings from the date when he or she informed the employer that he or she insists on the continuation of his or her employment until such time as the employer allows him or her to carry on in his or her work or his or her employment relationship is validly terminated?


    (1)  OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9.


    Top