This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CN0096
Case C-96/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bremen (Germany) lodged on 16 February 2021 — DM v CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA
Case C-96/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bremen (Germany) lodged on 16 February 2021 — DM v CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA
Case C-96/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bremen (Germany) lodged on 16 February 2021 — DM v CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA
OJ C 138, 19.4.2021, p. 22–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
19.4.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 138/22 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bremen (Germany) lodged on 16 February 2021 — DM v CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA
(Case C-96/21)
(2021/C 138/29)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Amtsgericht Bremen
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: DM
Defendant: CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA
Question referred
Is Article 16(l) of Directive 2011/83/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 (‘the Consumer Rights Directive’) to be interpreted as meaning that it is sufficient for the exclusion of the consumer’s right of withdrawal if the trader does not directly provide the consumer with a service related to leisure activities but sells the consumer a right of access to such a service?
(1) Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64).